## 0. CRITICAL UPDATE (Cycle #85 via #168 Evidence)
**Premise revision:** This locus document originally framed the problem as **"v1.0 (incoherent) → v2.0 (target schema)"** migration. **Fresh-dogfood validation in cycle #84 proved this framing was underspecified.**
**Actual problem (evidence from #168):**
- There is **no coherent v1.0 envelope contract**. Each verb has a bespoke JSON shape.
-`claw list-sessions --output-format json` emits `{command, sessions}` — has `command` field
-`claw doctor --output-format json` emits `{checks, kind, message, ...}` — no `command` field
- Each verb renderer was written independently with no coordinating contract
**Revised migration plan — three phases instead of two:**
1.**Phase 0 (Emergency):** Fix silent failures (#168 bootstrap JSON). Every `--output-format json` command must emit valid JSON.
2.**Phase 1 (v1.5 Baseline):** Establish minimal JSON invariants across all 14 verbs without breaking existing consumers:
- Every command emits valid JSON when `--output-format json` is passed
- Every command has a top-level `kind` field identifying the verb
- Every error envelope follows the confirmed `{error, hint, kind, type}` shape
- Every success envelope has the verb name in a predictable location
- **Effort:** ~3 dev-days (no new design, just fill gaps and normalize bugs)
3.**Phase 2 (v2.0 Wrapped Envelope):** Execute the original Phase 1 plan documented below — common metadata wrapper, nested data/error objects, opt-in via `--envelope-version=2.0`.
4.**Phase 3 (v2.0 Default):** Original Phase 2 plan below.
5.**Phase 4 (v1.0/v1.5 Deprecation):** Original Phase 3 plan below.
**Why add Phase 0 + Phase 1 (v1.5)?**
- You can't migrate from "incoherent" to "coherent v2.0" in one jump. Intermediate coherence (v1.5 baseline) is required.
- Consumer code built against "whatever v1 emits today" needs a stable target to transition from.
- **Silent failures (bootstrap JSON) must be fixed BEFORE any migration** — otherwise consumers have no way to detect breakage.
**Blocker resolved:** The original blocker "v1.0 design vs v2.0 design" is actually "no v1 design exists; let's make one (v1.5) then migrate." This is a **clearer, lower-risk migration path**.
**Revised effort estimate:** ~9 dev-days total (Phase 0: 1 day + Phase 1/v1.5: 3 days + Phase 2/v2.0: 5 days) instead of ~6 dev-days for a direct v1.0→v2.0 migration (which would have failed given the incoherent baseline).
**Doctrine implication:** Cycles #76–#82 diagnosed "aspirational vs current" correctly but missed that "current" was never a single thing. Cycle #84 fresh-dogfood caught this. **Fresh-dogfood discipline (principle #9) prevented a 6-day migration effort from hitting an unsolvable baseline problem.**
1.**Schema parity:** Every `--output-format json` command emits v2.0 envelope shape exactly per SCHEMAS.md
2.**Success/error symmetry:** Success envelopes have `data` field; error envelopes have `error` object; never both
3.**kind semantic unification:**`data.kind` = verb identity (when present); `error.kind` = enum from §4.44. No overloading.
4.**Common metadata:**`timestamp`, `command`, `exit_code`, `output_format`, `schema_version` present in ALL envelopes
5.**Dual-mode support:**`--envelope-version=1|2` flag allows opt-in/opt-out during migration
6.**Tests:** Per-verb golden test fixtures for both v1.0 and v2.0 envelopes
7.**Documentation:** SCHEMAS.md documents both versions with deprecation timeline
---
## 6. Risks
### 6a. Breaking Change Risk
Phase 2 (default version bump) WILL break consumers that depend on flat-shape envelope. Mitigations:
- Dual-mode flag allows opt-in testing before default change
- Long grace period (Phase 3 deprecation ~6 months post-Phase 2)
- Clear migration guide + example consumer code
### 6b. Implementation Risk
14 verbs to migrate. Each verb has its own success shape (`checks`, `agents`, `phases`, etc.). Payload structure stays the same; only the wrapper changes. Mechanical but high-volume.
**Mitigation:** Start with doctor, status, version as pilot. If pattern works, batch remaining 11.
### 6c. Error Classification Remapping Risk
Changing `kind: "cli_parse"` to `error.kind: "parse"` is a breaking change even within the error envelope. Consumers doing `response["kind"] == "cli_parse"` will break.
**Mitigation:** Document explicitly in migration guide. Provide sed script if needed.